Do Virginity Pledges Keep Teens Safe?

Abstinence Promises Claim to Prevent Teen Sexual Activity

Jan 19, 2009 Kat Long

Do virginity pledges work? Studies say no. -Taliesin/Morguefile.com

Virginity pledges are a popular tool used in abstinence-only sex education. Are they effective in preventing teens from having sex before marriage?

In some abstinence education programs, students are encouraged to make “virginity pledges:” promises to remain virgins until marriage. Abstinence educators consider virginity pledges a useful tool to prevent teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. But the pledges’ effectiveness is disputed. At least three peer-reviewed studies have debunked the theory that virginity pledges prevent teen sexual activity, and advocates of comprehensive sex education argue that students who make virginity pledges are more likely to forgo condoms and birth control if they break their pledges.

Origins and Controversies

Virginity pledges were first introduced in 1993 by True Love Waits (TLW), a pro-abstinence program of the conservative Southern Baptist Convention. The concept of pledging sexual purity in the eyes of God proved popular, and a number of similar programs emerged during the 1990s. At the same time, evangelical Christianity exerted a strong influence on the sexual health policies and programs of the federal government. Beginning in 1996 with the Welfare Reform Act, Congress appropriated millions of dollars for abstinence-only sex education in America’s public schools. During the George W. Bush administration, federal funding increased from $73 million in 2001 to $204 million per year by 2008.

That created a situation wherein taxpayer money was going to fund religion-based sexual-abstinence programs in public schools, a violation of the Constitutional separation of church and state. In 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union won a federal lawsuit in which it charged the Silver Ring Thing (SRT), an abstinence program that employed Biblical verses and evangelical Christian doctrine was improperly receiving federal funds. SRT has since rejected federal funding so it can continue teaching its faith-based curricula.

Are Virginity Pledges Effective?

Researchers have found it difficult to prove a causal relationship between taking virginity pledges and later patterns of sexual activity, but four major studies of students who take virginity pledges have suggested that taking a pledge offers no guarantee of the pledger’s long-term abstinence.

The most recent study, published in the journal Pediatrics in December 2008, found that virginity pledges are neither harmful nor helpful in teens’ decisions about sexuality. Researchers at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health analyzed data in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (conducted in 1995-1996), examining a group of 934 teenagers of similar religious and sexual views. Of that number, 289 had taken virginity pledges, and 645 had not.

Over a period of five years, researchers discovered that religious pledgers were just as likely to have premarital sex than religious non-pledgers, but the pledgers were less likely to have safe sex (only 42% said they used condoms regularly) or use birth control (46% didn’t use it) than their peers.

After the five-year period, 82% of pledgers had forgotten or denied they had taken a virginity pledge, and exhibited no difference in specific sexual practices or rates of sexually transmitted diseases with their peers. The average age of having sex for the first time for both groups was 21, and 75% percent of all the young adults had had sex by that age.

My Reaction:

Teenage relations is when it is the most exciting and every encounter is a memorable learning experience.Teaching the common sense of protection, both from disease and pregnancy, is mandatory. Not much one can do to stop what comes naturally and is lots of fun.The downside occurs during spousal selection, when the past presents itself and the one you want finds you repulsive for your past acts. Well, that''s the way it goes.There is something nice about a person who hasn''t swapped liquids with hundreds of people.haha...Hormones are hormones. If you teach a teen about protected intercourse, they are more you know to use the protection. Teaching abstinence on the other hand goes against every raging hormone in a teenagers body.Having the mindset that says "if they don''t know about it, they wont do it" is unrealistic. Think about how many 7 and 8 month babies were born to newlyweds before it was acceptable to be pregnant before marriage.

Assisted suicide

Liberty and Death:
A manifesto concerning an individual's
right to choose to die

By Derek Humphry
24 March 2009

In a spirit of compassion for all, this manifesto proclaims that every competent adult has the incontestable right to humankind’s ultimate civil and personal liberty -- the right to die in a manner and at a time of their own choosing.

Whereas modern medicine has brought great benefits to humanity, it cannot entirely solve the pain and distress of the dying process.

Each person deals with death in their individual way. Which way is determined by their health, their ethics, and personal living conditions.

The degree to which physical pain and psychological distress can be tolerated is different in all humans. Quality of life judgments are private and personal, thus only the sufferer can make relevant decisions.

Persuasion or provocation to the act of self-killing are deplorable and should be punished according to relevant laws. ‘Suicide’ no longer being a crime, it is unacceptable to prosecute well-meaning people for ‘assisted suicide’.

Medically hastened death by request should be made lawful as it is now in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland and the American states of Oregon and Washington (each has different rules).

Choosing to hasten death by self-starvation and dehydration should be accompanied by palliative care. Electing to die by terminal sedation is also a choice provided it is freely made by the patient.

Advance Directives (Living Wills) and Durable Powers of Attorney for Health Care must be respectfully considered by medical professionals at all times.

Views on the dying process contrary to those expressed in this manifesto are respected, but must not trump the autonomy of the dying person’s own decisions.

reaction:

I found myself with many mixed feelings. I found myself often feeling bad for the patients , doctors dealt with but more often felt sorry for them that they should be responsible for so many deaths. It is a sad road to travel on when faced with a terminal disease. It includes many harsh realities and many are not prepared to deal with their illness.   There are many aspects I chose to look at when preparing to write this paper. A person's self-worth is one and also the doctor's evaluation of a person's self-worth. I chose to take my own personal stand on the issue, which includes my own opinions, feelings, and thoughts on the many controversies surrounding Euthanasia. I also chose to write about the "Slippery Slope" for I find it to be a very relevant and useful tool in looking at the topic of Euthanasia.